Thu, Mar 2, 2017 | updated 01:35 AM IST

Judicial push backed by legislative intent key to Indian politics reforming itself

Updated: Jan 05, 2017 13:38 IST

By Shambhavi Ravishankar

New Delhi [India], Jan.5 (ANI): The New Year saw the Supreme Court of India passing a judgment that has genuine implications on the business of politics. A thorough reading of the judgments given by the 7 judges reveals some very interesting points of discussion. Two questions plagued the Justices: firstly, what method of legal interpretation should decide the scope and meaning of Section 123(3) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 ('the Act'); a literal or a purposive contextual interpretation. Secondly, what is the Constitutional position on the balancing of diverse interests with the secular nature of our polity?

Justice Madan B. Lokur (and Justice Rao and Justice Thakur), who represented the majority opinion, answered these questions after beautifully tracing the legislative history of the Act and the precedents under the same. The majority opined that a purposive interpretation was necessary keeping in mind "the social context of Section 123(3) and today's social and technological context" (Paragraph 46 of his judgment). He also stated that since S.123(3) was introduced as an amendment to the Act around the time that Section 153A of the Indian Penal Code was introduced (prohibition on promoting enmity between groups on various grounds), in Parliament all those years ago, they must be read together. It was the legislative intent to prevent "fissiparous, communal and separatist tendencies". (Para 28).

There was no fundamental right to be elected, and therefore Article 19's protection in the Constitution, had no bearing on a candidate. Candidacy was a special right that came with conditions of conduct. Justice S. A. Bobde, added on to this stating that Section 123(3) protected the entire transaction; the voter's right to vote and the candidate's pitch. (para 2 of his judgment). Any appeal made to an elector by a candidate/his agent on the ground of religion, race, caste, community, or language of either the candidate, his agent or the elector, amounts to a corrupt practice, was laid down.

Honourable Justices Goel, Lalit and Chandrachud, who dissented, brought out how secular discourse and politics did not automatically neglect the guarding of special interests based on the grounds listed above. The Constitution enshrined several protections to ameliorate people disadvantaged based on these grounds. Based on this, the dissenting judges believed that there was merit in continuing the judicial position that the law only prohibited a candidate from seeking votes based on his religion etc.

One issue with the judgment is the practical implications off "any appeal". When candidates make pitches to the people, the language and mediums they use will come under scrutiny so that it does not fall foul of this judgment. The Court remained silent on providing guidelines on how to determine this, stating that "it is a matter of evidence". Not providing some guiding principles or tests for determining whether language used will constitute an appeal on non-secular or divisive grounds, has left the matter not fully resolved, and open to re-litigation. The line between mere discussion and any appeal must be drawn.

There is truth the legal reasoning of all seven judges. Given how Indian politics has largely been a power protecting exercise, the question we must answer impartially is, have diverse interests been protected? Indian politics exemplifies what the Greek playwright Aristophanes wrote in the play "Knights", "to win the people, always cook them some savoury that pleases them."

No political party anywhere in India can claim that they are free from accusations of pandering to a stratum of voters. The two major ruling parties, BJP and the Congress, at various points in history, have had allegations of being pro - Hindutva or pro - Muslim levied against them.

In 2014, India recorded its highest voter turnout of 66.4%. One of the reasons for this was a desperate need in radical change in policy. This judgment is a big boost to the modern Indian voter, as well as a reminder that Indians irrespective of their background, have a lot of common interests in need of protecting: better infrastructure, a fairer tax regime, access to education, job opportunities, proper wages and working conditions, and accountability of the Government to name a few. MPs and MLAs should not be asked what they are being done for a given section, but what they are doing for Indians entirely. This judgment views the election process in entirety, and scrutinises the position of the voter. If we are truly to be a secular nation, our leaders must be elected through a secular mechanism. Gaining votes based on parameters such as religion, deviates attention on more essential questions of common development.

The multi-party system was adopted to represent the myriad interests in India. There are sections of society who have been denied basic human rights and their needs merit genuine representation and discussion. The judgment will have a positive implication on this if it is applied in good faith and in true sense of its wordings. It will motivate parties to speak policy to the people's who's interests it seeks to represent. It will dissuade parties from asking people for votes based on fear of being marginalised. The judgment could change the political dialogue of the country.

Religion and language should be deeply personal and should not determine how people interact with one another. The concept of caste and community discrimination should hold no value in social interaction. An election is not about the candidate alone. It is about the vision the candidate has for his given constituency and the needs of the voters (who are of different backgrounds) in that constituency. Without a judicial push backed by legislative intent of this kind, politics will never reform itself.

This is not an idealistic fancy or wish. This is a legitimate issue that plagues our Governance structures today. To have free and fair elections, parties cannot be allowed to divide the electorate. (ANI)

Delhi LG issues directives for women's safety

Updated: Mar 02, 2017 00:22 IST

New Delhi [India], Mar. 2 (ANI): Delhi Lieutenant Governor (LG) Anil Baijal on Wednesday chaired a meeting of task force on women safety and directed for digitisation of data in respect of sexual offences against women for fast track investigation of FIRs.

Full Story >>

Arrest warrant against Azam Khan

Updated: Mar 01, 2017 22:50 IST

Allahabad (Uttar Pradesh),[India] Mar 1 (ANI): A Lucknow bench of the Allahabad High Court on Wednesday issued an arrest warrant against senior Samajwadi Party leader Azam Khan, in connection with suspension of a Uttar Pradesh Jal Nigam engineer.

Full Story >>

New Delhi [India], Mar. 1 (ANI): The Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO) on Wednesday conducted the successful launch of the interceptor missile Advanced Area Defence (AAD) from Abdul Kalam Island, Odisha.

Full Story >>

New Delhi [India], Mar 1 (ANI): In the wake of recently reported cases where people were duped by unidentified persons by delivering false promise to give a job at the Indira Gandhi International Airport, the airport authorities along with the Delhi Police, in a coordinated operation nabbed two accused in the case.

Full Story >>

New Delhi [India], Mar 1 (ANI): The Sashastra Seema Bal (SSB) 41st Battallion's troops in Ranidanga, West Bengal on Wednesday rescued two Nepalese girls from the clutches of a human trafficking racket.

Full Story >>

Hajipur (Bihar) [India], Mar 1 (ANI): Following the uproar over Bihar Minister Abdul Jalil Mastan's controversial comment on Prime Minister Narendra Modi today, Union Minister of Urban Development, Venkaiah Naidu tore into the Congress leader questioning how he became a politician in the first place.

Full Story >>

New Delhi [India], March. 1 (ANI): Even as the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) has announced that the Indian techie was killed in an alleged racial attack in Kansas, United States, Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) spokesperson Gopal Bagley on Wednesday said the Indian Government is closely engaging with the authorities in other countries for ensuring the safety of their citizens.

Full Story >>

Mumbai (Maharashtra) [India], March. 1 (ANI): The Bombay High Court on Wednesday set aside a Maharashtra Government order that made Marathi language compulsory for auto rickshaw permits.

Full Story >>

Maharajganj (Uttar Pradesh) [India], Mar 1 (ANI): Addressing a rally in Maharajganj on Wednesday, Prime Minister Narendra Modi said polls would change the fate of the Samajwadi Party (SP), the Bahujan Samaj Party (BSP) and the Congress.

Full Story >>

Kushinagar (Uttar Pradesh) [India], March. 1 (ANI): Congress vice president Rahul Gandhi on Wednesday lashed out at Prime Minister Narendra Modi, saying that the latter works only for capitalists and overlooks poor farmers.

Full Story >>

New Delhi [India], Mar. 1 (ANI): The Delhi High Court on Wednesday cancelled the parole which was granted to former Haryana chief minister O. P. Chautala who is facing charges in a disproportionate assets case, after he violated the terms and conditions of the parole.

Full Story >>

New Delhi [India], March. 1 (ANI): The Supreme Court on Wednesday adjourned a matter pertaining to predatory pricing as alleged by the Competition Commission of India (CCI) against Uber.

Full Story >>

New Delhi [India], Mar 1 (ANI): A special court on Wednesday sentenced an-ex manager of Punjab National Bank, Adyar Branch Chennai and four others to imprisonment for causing a loss of 3.34 crore to the bank.

Full Story >>

Varanasi (Uttar Pradesh) [India] March 1 (ANI): Doubting the West Bengal Government's investigation against BJP's women wing leader Juhi Chowdhury's involvement in child trafficking case, party national general secretary Kailash Vijayvargiya on Wednesday alleged that the saffron party workers are being trapped and demoralised by the state government.

Full Story >>

New Delhi [India], March. 1 (ANI): The Delhi Police on Wednesday said that a peaceful protest was being carried out by the students in the Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU).

Full Story >>

Amritsar [India], Mar. 1 (ANI): In yet another gesture of goodwill, India on Wednesday released 39 Pakistan prisoners and handed them over to Islamabad at the Wagah border.

Full Story >>

Siliguri [India], Mar. 1 (ANI): Bharatiya Janata Party's women wing leader Juhi Chowdhury, who was arrested by the Crime Investigation Department (CID) from the India-Nepal border as a suspect in connection with the child trafficking case, has sent t

Full Story >>

Patna (Bihar) [India], March. 1 (ANI): A day after raking up a controversy for his derogatory statement against Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Bihar's Excise and Prohibition Minister Abdul Jalil today tendered an apology stating that his assertion was not aimed at hurting anyone.

Full Story >>

Kerala [India], Mar.1 (ANI): Forum Against Communist Terrorism (FACT) is holding a nationwide protest today to condemn the Communist Party of India (Marxist)-led government's failure to stop political murders of the Rashtriya Swayamsewak Sangh (RSS) members in Kerala last year.

Full Story >>

ABVP now protests outside Delhi Police HQ

Updated: Mar 01, 2017 16:25 IST

New Delhi [India], Mar. 1 (ANI): The Bharatiya Janata Party's (BJP) youth wing Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Praishad (ABVP) staged a protest outside the Delhi Police Headquarters here on Wednesday demanding action against the 'anti-India' slogans that were raised at the Jawaharlal Nehru campus last year.

Full Story >>