Thu, Jun 22, 2017 | updated 05:55 PM IST

Could an India-Pakistan conflict spillover to China

Updated: Sep 26, 2016 15:37 IST      
Could an India-Pakistan conflict spillover to China

Hong Kong, Sept. 26 (ANI): As security tensions spiked between India and Pakistan following an attack on an Indian Army base in Kashmir on 18 September, the question should be asked whether China would intervene if war broke out between the two nemeses.

What has been said officially? Premier Li Keqiang was in Pakistan last week, describing the two countries as "all-weather strategic cooperative partners" that "always firmly support each other and share an unbreakable friendship". Would that friendship extend to China going to war on Pakistan's behalf?

On September 21, China's Foreign Ministry spokesman Lu Kang said Beijing was "deeply concerned" about the strained relationship between India and Pakistan. "We urge relevant parties to exercise restraint and avoid fueling the tension."

He added, "Both India and Pakistan are significant countries in the region. We hope that the two countries will step up communication and dialogue, properly deal with their differences and jointly contribute to regional peace, stability and security."

These comments indicated that China would like, first of all, to play some kind of peacemaker role. It urged cool heads.

China has indicated a more robust stance during a meeting of the Chinese consul general in Lahore and the Punjab chief minister Shahbaz Sharif, according to a Dawn newspaper article. Yu Boren was quoted as saying, "In case of any (foreign) aggression, our country will extend its full support to Pakistan."

The article continued quoting Yu, "We are and will be siding with Pakistan on the Kashmir issue. There is no justification for atrocities on unarmed Kashmiris in (India)-held Kashmir, and the Kashmir dispute should be solved in accordance with aspirations of the Kashmiris."

While these comments can be construed as strong support for Pakistan, they fall far short of a declaration of war! Indeed, Yu cannot be considered as possessing much authority in terms of Chinese foreign policy.

Indeed, we must consider Beijing's long-held foreign policies. China proclaims a policy of non-interference in the affairs of other nations. For example, in President Xi Jinping's first trip aboard, he said in Moscow, "Matters that fall within the sovereign rights of a country should be managed only by the government and people of that country."

It is true, however, that the country's snowballing overseas interests and investments are putting this policy under pressure. A report by the Center for a New American Security, 'More Willing & Able: Charting China's International Security Activism', commented, "With more at stake in various military, economic, and diplomatic matters around the world, what happens inside other countries' borders is increasingly important to Beijing. Key Chinese interests overseas are now vulnerable to civil war, domestic terrorism, state failure, anti-Chinese sentiment over environmental and labor concerns, and other sources of internal instability."

The publication quoted Pang Zhongying, a professor at Renmin University, "Dependence on overseas resources, markets and energy will oblige China to adjust its foreign policy by, de facto, abandoning some of its 'nos' such as 'non-interference' and 'not taking the lead'."

A complicating factor is that part of the $46 billion China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) passes through the disputed region of Kashmir. It appears Chinese interests are selfish rather than altruistic, for ultimately the CPEC gives China access directly to the Indian Ocean and will bring in financial returns.

It is unlikely that investment will ever approach the above figure. China is investing in individual projects on a piecemeal basis, with increasing security costs and risks a matter of acute anxiety to Chinese investors. China would wish to protect its investments and the best way to do that it to advocate peaceful relations between India and Pakistan.

China is very concerned too about militant Islamists emanating from or hiding out in Pakistan's lawless tribal belts, this as it conducts its own struggle to put down Islamic extremism in Xinjiang Province. Consider too that the ideological divide between the two countries. The atheistic Chinese Communist Party does not really care for Islam, so stepping into a war at Pakistan's behest is very unlikely.

Notably, Pakistan and China do not have a formal security agreement such as those mutual defense treaties that the US has with a number of Asia-Pacific allies.

China is glad to have Pakistan as a stalwart buyer of military equipment, but it would be an extreme minority in Beijing who would advocate for intervention in any Pakistan-India conflict. Would China be willing to put all its eggs in one basket by backing Islamabad to the hilt in any war?

The focus for China is on Taiwan and its maritime periphery in the East China Sea and South China Sea. Its primary strategic competitor is the USA, not India. It is unlikely Beijing's leadership would allow China to be drawn into a conflict so far removed from its key strategic goals.

Though the chances of the People's Liberation Army (PLA) going to full-scale war in support of Pakistan are so remote, there are other ways China could show backing to Islamabad. Indeed, Chinese support embolden Pakistan considerably, which would complicate Delhi's decision-making process.

China could conceivably conduct special protection missions to secure important assets or infrastructure in Pakistan. Its financial investments in the CPEC could become raison d'etre financially to deploy special forces and the like to Pakistan territory. It could do so with or without Pakistan's invitation, but the former would certainly fortify the deterrence effect. Even if the possibility of PLA troops engaging in fighting is minimal, this move by itself would constitute a serious statement of intent.

China lacks suitable platforms for long-range power projection. It has only one training aircraft carrier, for instance, and just four landing platform dock ships are currently in service in the PLA Navy (PLAN). Under the pretense of securing sea lines of communication, the navy could conceivably create expeditionary task forces of several LPDs protected by destroyers and a screen of submarines to sail into the Indian Ocean, but it would amount to a show of force only. Such a task force with overextended lines of communication would be vulnerable to Indian strikes far from home.

The PLAN could put a number of submarines into the Indian Ocean, although it would rely on Pakistan ports to resupply them for a long-term deployment. These could harass Indian naval vessels, but again the PLAN does not have the wherewithal to support a large number of vessels in distant seas.

Airlift capacity in the PLA Air Force (PLAAF) is low for such a large military, so air bridges of supplies to Pakistan would be limited. The Y-20 has only just entered service, and air-to-air tankers are few in number. Interestingly, airpower was not widely utilized in the 1962 war between China and India, but the PLAAF is relatively well placed to perform well against India.

Instead, ballistic missiles and cruise missiles would offer more of a deterrent threat against India. The Center for a New American Security report stated, "With improvements in space architecture, over-the-horizon targeting and adaptation to existing sea-based launch platforms, such missiles could be repurposed to constitute a potent, if narrowly focused, force projection tool."

Cyberwarfare is definitely an area that China could use most forcibly against India as it offers plausible deniability and does not put lives directly in the firing line. China also has the capability to attack space-based satellites of hostile nations, although this would be a far more controversial move that is extremely unlikely.

Although not referring specifically to an Indian conflict, the aforementioned report concluded, "The leadership appears committed to investing in critical enabling capabilities to expand the effective range of China's military might. In different combinations and contexts, a panoply of these capabilities could allow China to undertake a range of military activities outside its immediate environs."

Any confrontation between China and India is likely to involve ground forces rather than sea power, and what India fears most is a simultaneous two-front war. This would stretch the armed forces to breaking point. The Sino-Indian border is already a flashpoint, and this is the sphere that the PLA would be most likely to exploit, for instance in the Aksai Chin or Arunachal Pradesh.

Mutual mistrust is already rampant. Larry M. Wortzel, writing in 'PLA Contingency Planning and the Case of India', published last year by the National Defense University Press in the USA, highlighted, "Each side anticipates hostile action from the other and possesses a heightened sense of vulnerability vis-a-vis the other. Moreover, when an incident or border violation occurs, the tendency is to assume malicious or nefarious intent on the part of the actor."

China appears to have adopted a policy of keeping India on edge via a series of pinprick incursions and infrastructure development. By ramping up small-scale incursions along the frontier, China could begin to coerce Indian strategy.

China can build up forces in Tibet by moving troops by road and rail from areas like Chengdu. The PLA could move numerous divisions into the border area by rail and road, quickly overwhelming Indian forces numerically. India still has strategic vulnerability as it plays catch up on extensive infrastructure that China has constructed on its side of the border.

Of course, there is the distinct possibility of a rapid escalation with such border infractions. A small action could swiftly lead to unintended consequences if one country overreacts.

What did China learn from the 1962 war and how might it respond to a preemptive Indian thrust across the border? According to Wortzel, its "first order of business was to deal a 'painful blow' to Indian forces that had intruded into China. Surprise and speed in the counterattack were deemed to be extremely important to PLA success, and in both sections of the border, east and west, the PLA emphasized swiftness of operations. The PLA sought to follow up on combat successes and to pursue Indian forces that had abandoned border positions. Establishing and maintaining good logistics bases and lines of transportation were deemed critical to the PLA's success."

Beijing could up the ante by moving conventional missile launchers of the Rocket Force assets closer to the border. Moving them forward is likely to be quickly picked up by Indian intelligence, but again this would serve as deterrence for India. With the Rocket Force now better integrated into theater commands, their tactical use as part of a conventional war should be more effective than ever. However, the actual firing of a missile would be an enormous escalation.

Over all this looms the dark shadow that all three antagonists are nuclear powers. China maintains a 'no first use' policy of nuclear weapons, while India knowns it has outgunned by China. The wildcard, then, is Pakistan, especially if nuclear weapons got into the hands of extremist elements. Nevertheless, the specter of nuclear weapons should limit a conventional clash.

Many commentators assume China has a well-developed art of escalation management. However, this has not really been proven in practice. China's total miscalculation in the Permanent Court of Arbitration case in the South China Sea demonstrates that.

It is hoped that Beijing's intent is to reduce, rather than increase, tensions between India and Pakistan. The USA also plays an important restraining role in deescalating any India-Pakistan conflict, just as it did in Kargil.

One thing is for certain in the region's complicated geopolitics, Pakistan is set to play an even bigger role in Delhi's relations with Beijing. (ANI)

Congressional Black Caucus declines Trump's invitation

Updated: Jun 22, 2017 15:07 IST     

New York [U.S.], June 22 (ANI) :The Congressional Black Caucus has declined an invitation for a follow-up meeting with U.S. President Donald Trump, terming his administration's policies and proposals as detrimental to all black Americans and their constituencies.

Full Story >>

24 killed in Car Bomb attack at New Kabul Bank in Afghanistan

Updated: Jun 22, 2017 14:31 IST     

Kabul [Afghanistan], June 22 (ANI): As many as 24 people were killed and 60 others wounded when the militants launched a suicide attack on New Kabul Bank branch in Lashkargah, capital of Helmand province on Thursday. The intense fighting is still going on between the security forces and militants.

Full Story >>

Suicide attack at New Kabul Bank in Afghanistan's Helmand

Updated: Jun 22, 2017 13:50 IST     

Kabul [Afghanistan], June 22 (ANI) :Militants launched a suicide attack on New Kabul Bank branch in Lashkargh, capital of Helmand province on Thursday. The intense fighting is going on between the security forces and militants.

Full Story >>

Australia to resume bombing of ISIS targets in Syria

Updated: Jun 22, 2017 13:30 IST     

London [U.K], June22 (ANI): Australia will resume air combat missions against Islamic State targets in Syria after the Australian Defence Force lifted a temporary suspension initially sparked by Russian threats to shoot down coalition planes.

Full Story >>

Gulf crisis: Turkey sends First shipment of aid to Qatar

Updated: Jun 22, 2017 12:26 IST     

Ankara [Turkey], June 22 (ANI):Turkish economic minister Nihat Zeybekci said that the first Turkish ship carrying aid to Qatar has departed in a bid to break the embargo imposed on Doha by a number of Gulf countries.

Full Story >>

Destroying Daesh would not end problems, says Barzani

Updated: Jun 22, 2017 12:20 IST     

Kurd [Iran] June 22, (ANI) : The President of the Northern Iraq's Kurdish Regional Government (KRG), Masoud Barzani, has saidon Wednesday that destroying the Daesh group would not end problem and urged to address the causes that led to the emergence of the jihadist group.

Full Story >>

Imran condemns Sharif's govt to hinder JIT's investigation

Updated: Jun 22, 2017 12:20 IST     

Islamabad [Pakistan], June 22 (ANI): Imran Khan, chairman of the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) has expressed his concerns over Pakistan's ruling party Pakistan Muslim League-N's (PML-N) efforts to hinder fair accountability in the Joint Investigation Team's (JIT) probe into the money laundering charges against Pakistani Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif's family.

Full Story >>

Tokyo [Japan], June 22 (ANI): In a first ministerial level visit in almost 14 years, Turkish Foreign Minister Mevlut Cavusoglu is in Japan for a state visit who has described Japan as Ankara's major economic partner in the Asia-Pacific area.

Full Story >>

New York [U.S.] , June 22 (ANI) :Expressing concern over recent increase of terrorist attacks in Afghanistan that has brought underlying political tensions to the surface, India has raised some significant questions.

Full Story >>

Mosul mosque destruction means ISIS admitting defeat: Iraq PM

Updated: Jun 22, 2017 08:54 IST     

Mosul [Iraq], June 22 (ANI):Iraq Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi has said that the ISIS act of destroying the Great Mosque of Al-Nuri amounts to "an official announcement that they have admitted their defeat" in the eight-month-old battle of Mosul.

Full Story >>

Pakistan to make visa rules stringent for Chinese

Updated: Jun 22, 2017 07:24 IST     

Islamabad [Pakistan], June 22 (ANI): Pakistan has decided to make visa rules stringent for Chinese citizens after the recent abduction and killing of a Chinese couple from Quetta who was alleged of preaching Christianity secretly.

Full Story >>

Washington D.C. [United States], June 22 (ANI): United States President Donald Trump has vowed that the Republican Bill to repeal and replace ObamaCare would have a 'heart'.

Full Story >>

US asks China to pressurise North Korea to reduce escalation

Updated: Jun 22, 2017 06:12 IST     

Washington D.C. [United States], June 22 (ANI): U.S. Secretary of State Rex Tillerson has asked China to exert more economic and diplomatic pressure on North Korea if Beijing wants to prevent further escalation in the region.

Full Story >>

Russia cancels talks with US over new sanctions

Updated: Jun 22, 2017 04:34 IST     

Moscow [Russia], June 22 (ANI): Russia has cancelled its planned talks with the United States after Washington imposed a new series of sanctions over Moscow's military intervention in Ukraine.

Full Story >>

Man shouts 'Allahu Akbar', stabs officer at Michigan airport

Updated: Jun 22, 2017 04:13 IST     

Michigan [United States], June 22 (ANI): An officer at the Bishop International Airport was stabbed in the back and neck on Wednesday in what is being seen as a possible terror attack in Flint, Michigan, local media reports said.

Full Story >>

Sri Lankan Navy arrests four Tamil Nadu fishermen

Updated: Jun 22, 2017 02:01 IST     

Neduntheevu [Sri Lanka], June 22 (ANI): The Sri Lankan Navy on Wednesday arrested four Tamil Nadu fishermen for allegedly fishing in Sri Lanka's territorial waters.

Full Story >>

Washington D.C. [United States], June 22 (ANI): United States President Donald Trump's top aide Kenneth Juster is reportedly set to be named as the new U.S. ambassador to India.

Full Story >>

Trump, Saudi crown prince discuss Mideast peace

Updated: Jun 22, 2017 01:02 IST     

Washington D.C. [United States], June 22 (ANI): United States President Donald Trump on Wednesday called Saudi Arabia's new crown prince, Mohammed bin Salman, to congratulate him on his recent elevation and discussed ways to resolve the ongoing dispute in the gulf region.

Full Story >>

Geneva [Switzerland], June 21 (ANI): Baloch Republican Party activist Abdul Nawaz Bugti on Wednesday called on the United Nations Economic and Social Commission to raise concerns about the China Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) projects that have been causing 'political instability' in Pakistan's Balochistan area.

Full Story >>

London [U.K.], June 21 (ANI): As Britain's embattled Prime Minister Theresa May officially begins leading a minority government, Queen Elizabeth II read out a list of the government's intentions along with eight draft laws to take Britain out of the European Union.

Full Story >>