Six review pleas filed against SC's Ayodhya verdict
Updated : 2 days, 2 hours ago IST
New Delhi [India], Dec 6 (ANI): A total of six petitions were filed on Friday challenging the Supreme Court's November 9 decision granting ownership rights to Hindus parties in Ramjanmbhoomi-Babri Masjid land dispute case.
Read More
AIMPLB's review plea to be settled by Rajeev Dhavan
Updated : 5 days, 3 hours ago IST
New Delhi [India], Dec 3 (ANI): All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB) on Tuesday said the contribution of senior advocate Rajeev Dhavan to the Ayodhya land title dispute case has been "extraordinary" and that their review petition in the case will be settled by him.
Read More
Rajeev Dhavan has always been a symbol of justice, unity: AIMPLB
Updated : 5 days, 4 hours ago IST
New Delhi [India], Dec 3 (ANI): All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB) spokesperson Maulana Umrain Mahfuz Rahmani on Tuesday said that ousted senior advocate Rajeev Dhavan has always been a symbol of "justice and unity".
Read More
AIMPLB to file review plea against Ayodhya verdict before Dec 9, s
Updated : 6 days, 4 hours ago IST
New Delhi [India], Dec 2 (ANI): All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB) will file the petition seeking review of the Supreme Court's order on Ayodhya land title dispute case before December 9, said its secretary Zafaryab Jilani on Monday.
Read More
Jamiat Ulema-e-Hind files review petition against Ayodhya verdict
Updated : 6 days, 6 hours ago IST
New Delhi [India], Dec 2 (ANI): Muslim organisation Jamiat Ulema-e-Hind on Monday filed a petition seeking review of Supreme Court's verdict on Ayodhya title dispute case.
Read More
Iqbal Ansari distances himself from AIMPLB's decision to seek rev
Updated : 1 week, 3 days ago IST
Ayodhya (Uttar Pradesh) [India], Nov 28 (ANI): Iqbal Ansari, the main litigant in the Ayodhya land dispute case, on Thursday distanced himself from the decision of the All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB) to file a petition seeking review of the Supreme Court verdict.
Read More
AIMPLB to file review petition in Ayodhya case
Updated : 1 week, 4 days ago IST
New Delhi [India], Nov 27 (ANI): All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB) on Wednesday said that it will file a petition seeking review of Supreme Court's order in Babri Masjid-Ram Janmabhoomi case next month.
Read More
Jamiat Ulama-i-Hind to not file review plea against SC's verdict o
Updated : 2 weeks, 3 days ago IST
New Delhi [India], Nov 21 (ANI): Jamiat Ulama-i-Hind on Thursday passed a resolution stating it will not file a review petition against the Supreme Court verdict on Ayodhya title dispute case.
Read More
It is our right to file review petition: Maulana Arshad Madani on
Updated : 3 weeks ago IST
Lucknow (Uttar Pradesh) [India], Nov 17 (ANI): After attending the meeting of All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB) over Ayodhya verdict on Sunday, Maulana Arshad Madani of the Jamiat Ulema-e-Hind said that a review petition against the Supreme Court verdict on the Ayodhya dispute sho
Read More
UP Minister slams Muslim Board for holding review meet on Ayodhya
Updated : 3 weeks ago IST
Lucknow (Uttar Pradesh) [India], Nov 17 (ANI): Uttar Pradesh Minority Affairs Minister Mohsin Raza slammed All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB) for conducting a meeting to decide on filing the review petition on Ayodhya verdict saying, " they are just trying to spoil the atmosphere."
Read More
Ayodhya verdict: Muslim Law Board to meet shortly, to decide on fi
Updated : 3 weeks ago IST
Lucknow (Uttar Pradesh) [India], Nov 17 (ANI): All-India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB) is scheduled to hold a meeting at 10 am on Sunday in Lucknow to discuss if the board will file a review petition regarding the apex court verdict on Ayodhya.
Read More
AIMPLB's Kamal Farooqui expresses disappointment over Ayodhya verd
Updated : 4 weeks, 1 day ago IST
New Delhi [India], Nov 9 (ANI): All India Muslim Personal Law Board Member (AIMPLB) Kamal Farooqui on Saturday expressed disappointment on the Supreme Court judgement in Ayodhya land title dispute case saying, the verdict was pronounced more on the basis of "faith" than "facts."
Read More